DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Kia Cadenza vs 2013 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Cadenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolvo
CadenzaModelS60
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
181 HPPower163 HP
231 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4965 mmLength4628 mm
1850 mmWidth1865 mm
1475 mmHeight1484 mm
1506 KgWeight1582 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Kia Cadenza and 2013 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…