DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Kia Cadenza vs 2010 Acura RDX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura RDX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeAcura
CadenzaModelRDX
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,5 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement2300 cc
181 HPPower240 HP
231 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
—Average consumption11,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4965 mmLength4635 mm
1850 mmWidth1870 mm
1475 mmHeight1655 mm
1506 KgWeight1698 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Kia Cadenza and 2010 Acura RDX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura RDX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…