DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Kia Avella vs 2000 Nissan Bluebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeNissan
AvellaModelBluebird
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
183 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
147 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption8 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
7 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4165 mmLength4470 mm
1665 mmWidth1695 mm
1450 mmHeight1445 mm
930 KgWeight1110 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Kia Avella and 2000 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…