DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Avella vs 2009 BMW X6 M Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW X6 M

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 40.25 points.

56.25–96.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia AvellaSpecificationBMW X6 M
KiaMakeBMW
AvellaModelX6 M
2000Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

Kia AvellaSpecificationBMW X6 M
—0–100 km/h4,7 s
160 km/hTop speed275 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement4395 cc
76 HPPower555 HP
100 NmTorque680 Nm
4Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Kia AvellaSpecificationBMW X6 M
PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank85 lt
—Urban consumption19,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,8 lt
—Average consumption13,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia AvellaSpecificationBMW X6 M
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
145 R13Tyre size275/40 R20; 315/35 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia AvellaSpecificationBMW X6 M
3565 mmLength4877 mm
1605 mmWidth1983 mm
1460 mmHeight1690 mm
795 KgWeight2380 Kg
2295 mmWheelbase2933 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Avella and 2009 BMW X6 M approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW X6 M leads the E-Kıyasla score by 40.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…