DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jeep Wrangler vs 2005 Jeep Wrangler Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeJeep
WranglerModelWrangler
2003Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
174 km/hTop speed174 km/h
3956 ccEngine displacement3964 cc
193 HPPower178 HP
319 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank72 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption18,6 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
LT 245/75 R16Tyre size205/75 R15

Dimensions

3947 mmLength3883 mm
1693 mmWidth1732 mm
1764 mmHeight1780 mm
1725 KgWeight1495 Kg
2373 mmWheelbase2373 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jeep Wrangler and 2005 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…