DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Jeep Wrangler vs 1998 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeFord
WranglerModelExplorer
2000Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
170 km/hTop speed171 km/h
3956 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
192 HPPower208 HP
318 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank83 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption18,2 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size255/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3883 mmLength4530 mm
1694 mmWidth1790 mm
1750 mmHeight1800 mm
1495 KgWeight1670 Kg
2373 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Jeep Wrangler and 1998 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…