DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Jeep Wrangler vs 2004 Jeep Wrangler Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeJeep
WranglerModelWrangler
2005Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
174 km/hTop speed174 km/h
3964 ccEngine displacement3956 cc
178 HPPower193 HP
290 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank72 lt
18,6 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
9,3 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre sizeLT 245/75 R16

Dimensions

3883 mmLength3947 mm
1732 mmWidth1693 mm
1780 mmHeight1764 mm
1495 KgWeight1725 Kg
2373 mmWheelbase2373 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Jeep Wrangler and 2004 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…