2009 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 3.8i V6 12V (196 Hp) 2009Overall Score74.5/100
2009 Jeep Wrangler vs 2010 Nissan Murano Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Nissan
Murano
Nissan Murano 3.5 V6 (249 Hp) 2010Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep WranglerSpecificationNissan Murano
JeepMakeNissan
WranglerModelMurano
2009Model year2010
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Jeep WranglerSpecificationNissan Murano
—0–100 km/h8,0 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3778 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
196 HPPower249 HP
315 NmTorque334 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep WranglerSpecificationNissan Murano
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank82 lt
16,7 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
11,9 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Jeep WranglerSpecificationNissan Murano
4x4Drivetrain4x4
4GearsX-Tronic CVT
255/75 R17Tyre size235/65 R18; 235/55 R20
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jeep WranglerSpecificationNissan Murano
4751 mmLength4860 mm
1877 mmWidth1885 mm
1834 mmHeight1720 mm
1895 KgWeight1790-1830 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2825 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Jeep Wrangler and 2010 Nissan Murano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…