DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jeep Wrangler vs 2010 Jeep Wrangler Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeJeep
WranglerModelWrangler
2009Model year2010
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3778 ccEngine displacement3778 cc
196 HPPower202 HP
315 NmTorque321 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank85 lt
16,7 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt
11,9 ltAverage consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears4
255/75 R17Tyre size255/70 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4751 mmLength4404 mm
1877 mmWidth1877 mm
1834 mmHeight1836 mm
1895 KgWeight1991 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jeep Wrangler and 2010 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…