2008 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 3.8i V6 12V (196 Hp) 2008Overall Score74.5/100
2008 Jeep Wrangler vs 2008 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 4.0 V6 (207 Hp) 2008Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep WranglerSpecificationFord Ranger
JeepMakeFord
WranglerModelRanger
2008Model year2008
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Jeep WranglerSpecificationFord Ranger
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3778 ccEngine displacement4014 cc
196 HPPower207 HP
315 NmTorque323 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep WranglerSpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
16,7 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Jeep WranglerSpecificationFord Ranger
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/75 R17Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jeep WranglerSpecificationFord Ranger
4751 mmLength5075 mm
1877 mmWidth1805 mm
1834 mmHeight1745 mm
1895 KgWeight—
2946 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Jeep Wrangler and 2008 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…