2007 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 3.8i V6 12V (196 Hp) 2007Overall Score74.5/100
2007 Jeep Wrangler vs 2007 Ford Sport Trac Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2007 • Ford
Sport Trac
Ford Sport Trac 4.0 L V6 (210 HP) 2007Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep WranglerSpecificationFord Sport Trac
JeepMakeFord
WranglerModelSport Trac
2007Model year2007
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Jeep WranglerSpecificationFord Sport Trac
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3778 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
196 HPPower210 HP
315 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep WranglerSpecificationFord Sport Trac
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
16,7 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Jeep WranglerSpecificationFord Sport Trac
4751 mmLength5339 mm
1877 mmWidth1872 mm
1834 mmHeight1819 mm
1895 KgWeight—
2946 mmWheelbase3315 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2007 Jeep Wrangler and 2007 Ford Sport Trac approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…