DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Jeep Wrangler vs 2014 Isuzu MU-X Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu MU-X

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeIsuzu
WranglerModelMU-X
2015Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2776 ccEngine displacement2999 cc
197 HPPower177 HP
460 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
85 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
245/75 R16Tyre size245/70 R16; 255/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4751 mmLength4825 mm
1877 mmWidth1860 mm
1840 mmHeight1825-1830 mm
2053 KgWeight1985-2025 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Jeep Wrangler and 2014 Isuzu MU-X approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu MU-X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…