DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jeep Wrangler vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeVolvo
WranglerModelS40
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2776 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
197 HPPower230 HP
460 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
245/75 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4751 mmLength4476 mm
1877 mmWidth1770 mm
1840 mmHeight1454 mm
2053 KgWeight1478 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jeep Wrangler and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…