DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jeep Wrangler vs 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.5–49.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMitsubishi
WranglerModelPajero
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
142 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2464 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
118 HPPower115 HP
198 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank71 lt
15 ltUrban consumption13 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size235/80 R16 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3886 mmLength4260 mm
1693 mmWidth1845 mm
1805 mmHeight1845 mm
1435 KgWeight1785 Kg
2373 mmWheelbase2545 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jeep Wrangler and 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…