DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Jeep Wrangler vs 1996 Mazda MPV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMazda
WranglerModelMPV
1995Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
4Seats7
2Doors4

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
150 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2464 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
121 HPPower115 HP
190 NmTorque277 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
76 ltFuel tank74 lt
13,7 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15 STyre size215/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3879 mmLength4670 mm
1676 mmWidth1825 mm
1735 mmHeight1750 mm
1460 KgWeight1775 Kg
2373 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Jeep Wrangler and 1996 Mazda MPV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…