DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1984 Audi 90 vs 1983 Opel Manta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Manta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 90SpecificationOpel Manta
AudiMakeOpel
90ModelManta
1984Model year1983
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Audi 90SpecificationOpel Manta
8,6 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement1979 cc
136 HPPower186 HP
186 NmTorque210 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 90SpecificationOpel Manta
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank50 lt
9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 90SpecificationOpel Manta
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 90SpecificationOpel Manta
4465 mmLength4475 mm
1682 mmWidth1670 mm
1365 mmHeight1320 mm
1060 KgWeight990 Kg
2538 mmWheelbase2518 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1984 Audi 90 and 1983 Opel Manta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Manta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…