1984 • Audi
90
Audi 90 2.2 E (136 Hp) 1984Overall Score63.5/100
1984 Audi 90 vs 1984 Lotus Excel Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1984 • Lotus
Excel
Lotus Excel 2.2 SE/SA (184 Hp) 1984Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Lotus Excel
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 90SpecificationLotus Excel
AudiMakeLotus
90ModelExcel
1984Model year1984
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Audi 90SpecificationLotus Excel
8,6 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
200 km/hTop speed217 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement2174 cc
136 HPPower184 HP
186 NmTorque224 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 90SpecificationLotus Excel
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption14,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
9 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 90SpecificationLotus Excel
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size215/50 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 90SpecificationLotus Excel
4465 mmLength4395 mm
1682 mmWidth1815 mm
1365 mmHeight1205 mm
1060 KgWeight1135 Kg
2538 mmWheelbase2490 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1984 Audi 90 and 1984 Lotus Excel approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lotus Excel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…