1984 • Audi
90
Audi 90 2.2 E (136 Hp) 1984Overall Score63.5/100
1984 Audi 90 vs 1982 Lotus Eclat Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1982 • Lotus
Eclat
Lotus Eclat 2.2 (162 Hp) 1982Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Lotus Eclat
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 90SpecificationLotus Eclat
AudiMakeLotus
90ModelEclat
1984Model year1982
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Audi 90SpecificationLotus Eclat
8,6 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
200 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement2174 cc
136 HPPower162 HP
186 NmTorque217 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 90SpecificationLotus Eclat
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
9 ltAverage consumption12,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 90SpecificationLotus Eclat
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size205/60 R14 V
Dimensions
Audi 90SpecificationLotus Eclat
4465 mmLength4458 mm
1682 mmWidth1816 mm
1365 mmHeight1207 mm
1060 KgWeight1102 Kg
2538 mmWheelbase2483 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1984 Audi 90 and 1982 Lotus Eclat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lotus Eclat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…