DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs 1996 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Grand Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeHolden
Grand CherokeeModelCommodore
1995Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
5210 ccEngine displacement5034 cc
211 HPPower224 HP
400 NmTorque385 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,0 ltAverage consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4489 mmLength4861 mm
1800 mmWidth1794 mm
1719 mmHeight1448 mm
1835 KgWeight1450 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 1996 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Grand Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…