1985 • Audi
90
Audi 90 2.2 CAT (120 Hp) 1985Overall Score61.25/100
1985 Audi 90 vs 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1985 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 2.5 i (106 Hp) 1985Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Oldsmobile Cutlass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 90SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
AudiMakeOldsmobile
90ModelCutlass
1985Model year1985
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 90SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
9,6 s0–100 km/h—
189 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement2471 cc
120 HPPower106 HP
170 NmTorque183 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 90SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 90SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/75 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 90SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4465 mmLength4555 mm
1682 mmWidth1700 mm
1376 mmHeight1330 mm
1200 KgWeight1185 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2625 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1985 Audi 90 and 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…