DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs 2008 Jeep Commander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeJeep
Grand CherokeeModelCommander
2004Model year2008
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4701 cc
235 HPPower231 HP
400 NmTorque410 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption19,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,2 lt
—Average consumption14,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/75 R16 STyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4787 mm
1836 mmWidth1900 mm
1763 mmHeight1826 mm
1784 KgWeight2235 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2008 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…