DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs 2009 Jeep Wrangler Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeJeep
Grand CherokeeModelWrangler
2010Model year2009
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3701 ccEngine displacement3778 cc
201 HPPower196 HP
315 NmTorque315 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
17,0 ltUrban consumption16,7 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
12,7 ltAverage consumption11,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
245/65 R17Tyre size255/75 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4751 mm
1870 mmWidth1877 mm
1740 mmHeight1834 mm
—Weight1895 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2009 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…