DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Audi 90 vs 1989 Mazda 929 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 929

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 90SpecificationMazda 929
AudiMakeMazda
90Model929
1989Model year1989
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats6
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 90SpecificationMazda 929
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
115 HPPower127 HP
172 NmTorque188 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 90SpecificationMazda 929
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,9 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 90SpecificationMazda 929
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R14Tyre size195/70 R14 91 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 90SpecificationMazda 929
4393 mmLength4690 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1397 mmHeight1427 mm
1110 KgWeight1300 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Audi 90 and 1989 Mazda 929 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 929 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…