DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs 2009 Mercury Milan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Milan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMercury
Grand CherokeeModelMilan
2011Model year2009
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
191 km/hTop speed188 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
190 HPPower212 HP
440 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
93 ltFuel tank68 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
265/60 R18Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4822 mmLength4862 mm
1943 mmWidth1834 mm
1781 mmHeight1417 mm
2272 KgWeight1535 Kg
2915 mmWheelbase2728 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2009 Mercury Milan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Milan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…