1985 • Audi
90
Audi 90 2.0 (113 Hp) 1985Overall Score61.25/100
1985 Audi 90 vs 1986 Nissan Leopard Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1986 • Nissan
Leopard
Nissan Leopard 2.0 V6 (115 Hp) 1986Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Leopard
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 90SpecificationNissan Leopard
AudiMakeNissan
90ModelLeopard
1985Model year1986
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Audi 90SpecificationNissan Leopard
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
113 HPPower115 HP
165 NmTorque163 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 90SpecificationNissan Leopard
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 90SpecificationNissan Leopard
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/60 R14Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 90SpecificationNissan Leopard
4465 mmLength4695 mm
1682 mmWidth1690 mm
1365 mmHeight1370 mm
1060 KgWeight1360 Kg
2538 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1985 Audi 90 and 1986 Nissan Leopard approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Leopard leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…