DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Jeep Compass vs 2010 Subaru Impreza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Compass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeSubaru
CompassModelImpreza
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,70 s0–100 km/h5,8 s
183 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
220 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,50 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
7,60 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
8,70 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/60 R17 HTyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4405 mmLength4415 mm
1810 mmWidth1740 mm
1630 mmHeight1475 mm
1535 KgWeight1390 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Jeep Compass and 2010 Subaru Impreza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Compass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…