DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Jeep Compass vs 2016 Abarth 595 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Abarth 595

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7.25 points.

63.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeAbarth
CompassModel595
2006Model year2016
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

10,70 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
183 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
170 HPPower180 HP
220 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank35 lt
10,50 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
7,60 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
8,70 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R17 HTyre size205/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4405 mmLength3660 mm
1810 mmWidth1627 mm
1630 mmHeight1485 mm
1535 KgWeight1090 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2300 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Jeep Compass and 2016 Abarth 595 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Abarth 595 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…