2012 • Jeep
Compass
Jeep Compass 2.0 (156 Hp) 2012Overall Score60.25/100
2012 Jeep Compass vs 2012 Ford Kuga Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 2.0 Duratorq TDCi (140 Hp) 2012Overall Score43/100
WINNER
Jeep Compass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 17.25 points.
60.25–43
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep CompassSpecificationFord Kuga
JeepMakeFord
CompassModelKuga
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Jeep CompassSpecificationFord Kuga
10,60 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
185 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement0 cc
156 HPPower140 HP
190 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep CompassSpecificationFord Kuga
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,20 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
6,10 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
7,60 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Jeep CompassSpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jeep CompassSpecificationFord Kuga
4448 mmLength4443 mm
1812 mmWidth1842 mm
1718 mmHeight1710 mm
1499 KgWeight1605 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2690 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Jeep Compass and 2012 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Compass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 17.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…