DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1988 Audi 90 vs 1984 Opel Ascona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 90SpecificationOpel Ascona
AudiMakeOpel
90ModelAscona
1988Model year1984
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 90SpecificationOpel Ascona
14,6 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
174 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
80 HPPower115 HP
155 NmTorque151 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 90SpecificationOpel Ascona
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank61 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 90SpecificationOpel Ascona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 90SpecificationOpel Ascona
4393 mmLength4366 mm
1695 mmWidth1668 mm
1397 mmHeight1395 mm
1090 KgWeight1010 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2574 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1988 Audi 90 and 1984 Opel Ascona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…