DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jeep Commander vs 2006 Cadillac Escalade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

85.5–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeCadillac
CommanderModelEscalade
2009Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
7Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
180 km/hTop speed174 km/h
5654 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
334 HPPower349 HP
509 NmTorque515 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank98 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption19,6 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption14,7 lt
—Average consumption16,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
245/65 R17Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength5052 mm
1900 mmWidth2004 mm
1826 mmHeight1885 mm
2345 KgWeight2635 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jeep Commander and 2006 Cadillac Escalade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…