2010 • Jeep
Commander
Jeep Commander 4.7 i V8 4WD (231) 2010Overall Score74.5/100
2010 Jeep Commander vs 2005 Ford Mustang Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 V8 GT (228 Hp) 2005Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Jeep Commander
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep CommanderSpecificationFord Mustang
JeepMakeFord
CommanderModelMustang
2010Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
7Seats2+2
5Doors2
Performance
Jeep CommanderSpecificationFord Mustang
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
231 HPPower228 HP
410 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep CommanderSpecificationFord Mustang
PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank58 lt
19,2 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
14,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Jeep CommanderSpecificationFord Mustang
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/65 R17Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jeep CommanderSpecificationFord Mustang
4787 mmLength4635 mm
1900 mmWidth1820 mm
1826 mmHeight1360 mm
2235 KgWeight1550 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Jeep Commander and 2005 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…