DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jeep Commander vs 2006 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMercury
CommanderModelMountaineer
2009Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
231 HPPower242 HP
410 NmTorque379 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank85 lt
19,2 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt
14,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/65 R17Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength4845 mm
1900 mmWidth1832 mm
1826 mmHeight1821 mm
2235 KgWeight2043 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2889 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jeep Commander and 2006 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…