DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jeep Commander vs 2006 Ford F-150 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeFord
CommanderModelF-150
2009Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
7Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
231 HPPower235 HP
410 NmTorque394 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank0 lt
19,2 ltUrban consumption—
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
14,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
5Gears—
245/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4787 mmLength—
1900 mmWidth—
1826 mmHeight—
2235 KgWeight—
2781 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jeep Commander and 2006 Ford F-150 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…