DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Jeep Commander vs 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeJeep
CommanderModelGrand Cherokee
2007Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4701 cc
231 HPPower235 HP
410 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank78 lt
19,2 ltUrban consumption—
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
14,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/65 R17Tyre size225/75 R16 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength4610 mm
1900 mmWidth1836 mm
1826 mmHeight1763 mm
2235 KgWeight1784 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Jeep Commander and 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…