DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Jeep Commander vs 2004 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeToyota
CommanderModel4runner
2006Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4664 cc
231 HPPower235 HP
410 NmTorque434 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank87 lt
19,2 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt
14,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/65 R17Tyre size265/70 R16; 265/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength4800 mm
1900 mmWidth1875 mm
1826 mmHeight1750 mm
2235 KgWeight2000 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Jeep Commander and 2004 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…