DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jeep Commander vs 2009 Suzuki XL7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeSuzuki
CommanderModelXL7
2009Model year2009
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
180 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3701 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
213 HPPower252 HP
319 NmTorque329 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption13,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/65 R17Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength5009 mm
1900 mmWidth1834 mm
1826 mmHeight1750 mm
2080 KgWeight1859 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2855 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jeep Commander and 2009 Suzuki XL7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…