DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Acura TL vs 2000 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeNissan
TLModelPathfinder
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed172 km/h
3206 ccEngine displacement3275 cc
203 HPPower170 HP
293 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption18,2 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption11,4 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4900 mmLength4530 mm
1785 mmWidth1840 mm
1425 mmHeight1750 mm
1575 KgWeight1890 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Acura TL and 2000 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…