2016 • Jeep
Cherokee
Jeep Cherokee Limited 2016 2.0 AWD 170 HPOverall Score72.5/100
2016 Jeep Cherokee vs 2016 Opel Cascada Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Opel
Cascada
Opel Cascada 2.0 CDTI (170 PS) 2016Overall Score72.75/100
WINNER
Opel Cascada
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationOpel Cascada
JeepMakeOpel
CherokeeModelCascada
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationOpel Cascada
10,3 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
192 km/hTop speed218 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
350 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationOpel Cascada
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationOpel Cascada
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
9Gears6
9ATXTransmission—
18Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationOpel Cascada
4624 mmLength4696 mm
1859 mmWidth1839 mm
1634 mmHeight1443 mm
1953 kgWeight1701-1816 Kg
423 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2695 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Jeep Cherokee and 2016 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…