DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jeep Cherokee vs 2006 Holden Caprice Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeHolden
CherokeeModelCaprice
2009Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3700 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
205 HPPower200 HP
314 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank75 lt
16,9 ltUrban consumption12 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
11,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/65 R17; 235/60 R18Tyre size225/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4493 mmLength5237 mm
1839 mmWidth1847 mm
1797 mmHeight1459 mm
1980 KgWeight1690 Kg
2694 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jeep Cherokee and 2006 Holden Caprice approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…