DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Jeep Cherokee vs 2005 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeLand Rover
CherokeeModelFreelander
2005Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
174 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2778 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
163 HPPower177 HP
400 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank60 lt
12 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4430 mmLength4433 mm
1820 mmWidth1809 mm
1865 mmHeight1709 mm
1960 KgWeight1550 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Jeep Cherokee and 2005 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…