DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Jeep Cherokee vs 2000 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeLand Rover
CherokeeModelRange Rover
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
115 HPPower136 HP
280 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
76 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/70 R15 STyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4288 mmLength4713 mm
1720 mmWidth1853 mm
1621 mmHeight1817 mm
1630 KgWeight2115 Kg
2575 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Jeep Cherokee and 2000 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…