DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Jeep Cherokee vs 1998 Land Rover Defender Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Defender

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeLand Rover
CherokeeModelDefender
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h18,1 s
165 km/hTop speed129 km/h
2464 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
118 HPPower113 HP
198 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
76 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4255 mmLength4590 mm
1725 mmWidth1790 mm
1630 mmHeight2059 mm
1515 KgWeight2055 Kg
2576 mmWheelbase2794 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Jeep Cherokee and 1998 Land Rover Defender approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Defender leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…