DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Jeep Cherokee vs 2005 Nissan Frontier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeNissan
CherokeeModelFrontier
2005Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors2

Performance

167 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2429 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
147 HPPower154 HP
215 NmTorque231 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15; 265/70 R16; 265/75 R16; 265/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4496 mmLength5220 mm
1819 mmWidth1850 mm
1866 mmHeight1879 mm
1803 KgWeight—
2650 mmWheelbase3200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Jeep Cherokee and 2005 Nissan Frontier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…