2002 • Jeep
Cherokee
Jeep Cherokee 2.4i 16V (147 Hp) 2002Overall Score66.25/100
2002 Jeep Cherokee vs 2002 Ford Contour Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Contour
Ford Contour 2.5i V6 24V LX (170 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Jeep Cherokee
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationFord Contour
JeepMakeFord
CherokeeModelContour
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationFord Contour
167 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2429 ccEngine displacement2539 cc
147 HPPower170 HP
215 NmTorque224 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationFord Contour
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption—
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,8 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationFord Contour
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABS—
Dimensions
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationFord Contour
4496 mmLength4671 mm
1819 mmWidth1755 mm
1866 mmHeight1384 mm
1803 KgWeight1257 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2704 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Jeep Cherokee and 2002 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…