2001 • Jeep
Cherokee
Jeep Cherokee 2.4i 16V (147 Hp) 2001Overall Score66.25/100
2001 Jeep Cherokee vs 2001 MG ZT Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • MG
ZT
MG ZT 2.5 i V6 24V (160 Hp) 2001Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Jeep Cherokee
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationMG ZT
JeepMakeMG
CherokeeModelZT
2001Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationMG ZT
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
167 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2429 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
147 HPPower160 HP
215 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationMG ZT
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationMG ZT
4496 mmLength4740 mm
1819 mmWidth1780 mm
1866 mmHeight1410 mm
1803 KgWeight1485 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2746 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Jeep Cherokee and 2001 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…