DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Jeep Cherokee vs 2016 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMitsubishi
CherokeeModelASX
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
187 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2360 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
177 HPPower147 HP
229 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
12,0 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
9Gears6
225/60 R17; 225/55 R18; 245/65 R17Tyre size215/60 R17 96H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4624 mmLength4295 mm
1859 mmWidth1770 mm
1670 mmHeight1615 mm
1842-1866 KgWeight1520 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Jeep Cherokee and 2016 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…