1992 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.3 E (133 Hp) 1992Overall Score63.5/100
1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Toyota Cresta Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Toyota
Cresta
Toyota Cresta 2.5 i 24V (180 Hp) 1992Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Cresta
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Cresta
AudiMakeToyota
80ModelCresta
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Cresta
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement2491 cc
133 HPPower180 HP
186 NmTorque235 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Cresta
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption16 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Cresta
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Cresta
4482 mmLength4750 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1406 mmHeight1390 mm
1270 KgWeight1370 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Toyota Cresta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Cresta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…