DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Jeep Cherokee vs 2013 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeKia
CherokeeModelOptima
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
187 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
225/60 R17; 225/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4623 mmLength4845 mm
1859 mmWidth1830 mm
1669 mmHeight1455 mm
1828 KgWeight1587-1648 Kg
2699 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Jeep Cherokee and 2013 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…