DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Jaguar XKR vs 1998 Jaguar XJR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XKR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.25–75.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeJaguar
XKRModelXJR
2000Model year1998
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,4 s0–100 km/h5,4 s
250 km/hTop speed254 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
363 HPPower363 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank81 lt
18 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
12,5 ltAverage consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/45 R18Tyre size255/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4760 mmLength5024 mm
1829 mmWidth1799 mm
1296 mmHeight1314 mm
1715 KgWeight1775 Kg
2588 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Jaguar XKR and 1998 Jaguar XJR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XKR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…