DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar XK 8 vs 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XK 8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

87.5–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeLand Rover
XK 8ModelRange Rover
2004Model year2006
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,6 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
250 km/hTop speed225 km/h
4196 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
395 HPPower390 HP
541 NmTorque550 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank105 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption22,4 lt
9,2 ltExtra-urban consumption12,2 lt
12,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
245/45 R18; 255/45 R18Tyre size255/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4760 mmLength4950 mm
1829 mmWidth1955 mm
1306 mmHeight1860 mm
1815 KgWeight2560 Kg
2588 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar XK 8 and 2006 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XK 8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…